Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 01500
Original file (PD 2014 01500.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXX     CASE: PD-2014-01500
BRANCH OF SERVICE: AIR FORCE     BOARD DATE: 20140917
SEPARATION DATE: 20050711


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SSgt/E-5 (8R000/Recruiter & 2T351/Vehicle and Vehicular Equipment Maintenance) medically separated for a back condition. He was issued a permanent L4 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The back condition, characterized as “low back pain”, was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AFI 48-123. No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The Informal PEB (IPEB) adjudicated “chronic back pain secondary to degenerative disc disease T12-L1 associated with myofascial pain syndrome” as unfitting, rated at 20%, with application of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “I have more pain in my back, I have had panic attacks while under stress. Loss of flexibility in bending and reaching, sitting, standing and so on.(continued) I’m having pain, loss of motion in my neck, and right shoulder and right knee. All of which have led me to a less fulfilled life. These combined with my other injuries interfere with everyday life, not to mention a career or having even gainful employed.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified, but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting back condition with myofascial pain is addressed below. The neck, right shoulder, left shoulder, left hip, depression, knee and panic attacks, as per the contentions were not identified by the MEB or PEB therefore are not within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. These and any other condition or contention not requested in this application, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.

The Board acknowledges the CI’s information regarding the significant impairment with which his service-connected conditions continue to burden him. IAW DoDI 6040.44, the Board’s authority is limited to making recommendations on correcting disability determinations. The Board’s role is thus confined to the review of medical records and all evidence at hand to assess the fairness of PEB rating determinations, compared to Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards, based on ratable severity at the time of separation.


 RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20050523
 VA* - (11.1 Mos. Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Chronic Back Pain… 5243 20% DDD, Thoracolumbar Spine 5243 20% 20060608
Other x 0 (Not in Scope)
 Other x 8 (Not in Scope) 20060616
Combined: 20%
 Combined: 40%
*Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 200 0726 (most proxima te to date of separation )


ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Chronic Back Pain Condition. The CI developed low back pain after a fall during training in 1999. Despite multi-modality physical therapy, pain medication and injections the CI continued to experience activity-limiting low back pain that sometimes radiated to his thighs. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a small right-sided disc protrusion at L1-2 and circumferential disc bulging at T12-L1. Evaluation by a neurosurgeon determined that there was no clear benefit to operative intervention and the CI opted against surgery. During a pain management appointment dated 3 February 2005 (5 months prior to separation), the specialist noted the chief complaint of low back pain and did not report any other areas of pain. The physical exam indicated evidence only of lumbar spine pain. The diagnosis assessment was lumbar spondylosis and myofascial pain syndrome.

During the narrative summary (NARSUM) exam dated 16 April 2005 (3 months prior to separation), the CI reported constant 3/10 severity pain in the central low back area. Sitting or driving for more than 15 minutes caused the severity to increase to 8/10 to 9/10. He was unable to jog or bike without significant pain and could not carry his recruiting supplies. Examination showed mild paraspinal lumbar muscle tenderness. Muscle spasm, gait and spinal contour were not mentioned. The examiner referred to the pain management physician’s diagnosis of myofascial pain as a component of the lumbar spondylosis.

At the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam dated 8 June 2006 (11 months after separation), the CI reported difficulty finding a job because of his back condition. Pain was constant and 3/10 to 4/10 in severity. Walking more than a couple of blocks or prolonged standing exacerbated the pain of 4/10 to 5/10. He took no medication for his back pain condition. Physical exam showed an increased lordotic curve, but comments of muscle spasm were omitted. Gait was normal and there was no use of an assistive device or back brace. Repetitive motion did not result in additional limitation. The goniometric range-of-motion (ROM) evaluations in evidence which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation, with documentation of additional ratable criteria, are summarized in the chart below.

Thoracolumbar ROM
(Degrees)		 MEB PT 3 Mo s . Pre-Sep VA C&P 11 Mo s . Post -Sep
Flexion (90 Normal) 45 60
Combined (240) 150 180
Comment +Painful motion +Painful motion
§4.71a Rating 20% 20%

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB assigned a 20% rating under the 5243 code (intervertebral disc syndrome) and properly subsumed myofascial pain syndrome in the adjudication. The VA also rated the condition at 20% using the same code. Based on the documented limitation of motion and IAW VASRD §4.71a criteria, at 20% rating is warranted in this case (forward flexion of the thoracolumbar spine greater than 30 degrees but not greater than 60 degrees). The next higher 40% rating requires forward flexion of the thoracolumbar spine of 30 degrees or less, or favorable ankylosis of the entire thoracolumbar spine, neither of which was present. The Board also could not find evidence to support a higher rating under the formula for rating intervertebral disc disease based on incapacitating episodes. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the chronic back pain condition.

BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the chronic back pain secondary to degenerative disc disease condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20131217, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record




                                   
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
DoD Physical Disability Board of Review


 SAF/MRB
Dear XXXXXXXXXXXXXX:

         Reference your application submitted under the provisions of DoDI 6040.44 (Title 10 U.S.C. § 1554a), PDBR Case Number PD-2014-01500

         After careful consideration of your application and treatment records, the Physical Disability Board of Review determined that the rating assigned at the time of final disposition of your disability evaluation system processing was appropriate. Accordingly, the Board recommended no re-characterization or modification of your separation.

         I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of the Board. I concur with that finding and their conclusion that re-characterization of your separation is not warranted. Accordingly, I accept their recommendation that your application be denied.

                                                               Sincerely,






 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
Attachment:
Record of Proceedings

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01529

    Original file (PD-2014-01529.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Strength and reflexes of the LEs were normal.A physical therapy evaluation of the upper back on 7 April 2009 separately noted ROM of the thoracic spine and ROM of the lumbar spine. After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB fitness determination for the neck condition and so no additional disability rating is recommended. Accordingly, the Board recommended no...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD 2013 00870

    Original file (PD 2013 00870.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The back pain condition, characterized as “chronic myofascial thoracic pain syndrome,” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) as not meeting medical standards IAW AFI 48-123. X-rays and computer aided tomograms of the spine done as part of his work up were normal without evidence of fracture or disc problem.The MEB narrative summary (NARSUM) dated 24 May 2007,7 months prior to separation,described in the physical examination that the CI demonstrated “…normal gait and station,...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01921

    Original file (PD-2013-01921.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    At times he complained of thoracic back pain, but mostly his pain was low back pain (LBP). Physical Disability Board of Review I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of the Board.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-01045

    Original file (PD2011-01045.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s authority as defined in DoDI 6044.40, however, resides in evaluating the fairness of DES fitness determinations and rating decisions for disability at the time of separation. Neurosurgical notes do not indicate whether the scoliosis noted on x-rays was developmental in nature, due to the L1 vertebral fracture, or due to muscle spasm. Based on this ROM examination, the VA granted an additional 10% rating for back pain in accordance with the VASRD general rating formula for...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 03102

    Original file (PD 2014 03102.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB and VA both rated the back condition at 20% for decreased spinal ROM using different codes;the PEB used code 5241 (spinal fusion) and the VA, code 5237,(lumbosacral strain), IAW VASRD §4.71a.A rating of 20%, under both codes, requires forward flexion of the thoracolumbar spine of greater than 30 degrees but not greater than 60 degrees.The next higher rating, 40%, under both codes requires forward flexion of 30 degrees or less or ankylosis of the entire thoraco- lumbar spine. ...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02331

    Original file (PD-2013-02331.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    There was no change in range-of-motion (ROM) with three repetitions. Board members agreed that, based on the limitation of motion in evidence on the respective exams, the corresponding ratings by the PEB and VA were appropriate. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01447

    Original file (PD-2013-01447.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    SEPARATION DATE: 20041206 The LBP, characterized as “chronic low back pain” and “degenerative disc disease (DDD),” were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501.No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The Informal PEB adjudicated “degenerative disc disease with chronic low back pain”as unfitting, rated 10%.The CI made no appeals and was medically separated. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02299

    Original file (PD-2013-02299.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Neck Pain…524310%Degenerative Disc Disease, Cervical Spine5299-524210%20060731Chronic Low Back Pain…524310%Degenerative Disc Disease, Lumbar Spine524210%20060731Other x 0 (Not In Scope)Other x 7 RATING: 20%RATING: 20% *Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20070215(most proximate to date of separation [DOS]). At pain management visit dated 10 May 2004 the CI reported increased neck and right upper back pain with...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01603

    Original file (PD-2013-01603.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic LBP…5299-529510%Degenerative Disc Disease, Lumbosacral Spine524220%20060315Otherx 0 (Not in Scope)Other x9 20060315 Rating: 10%Combined: 90%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20060708 most proximate to the date of separation (DOS) ANALYSIS SUMMARY :IAW DoDI 6040.44, the Board’s authority is limited to making recommendations on correcting disability determinations. DoDI 6040.44 provides for consideration of...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00570

    Original file (PD2012-00570.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Three months prior to separation, the PEB adjudicated the mechanical LBP post MVA condition as unfitting, rated 10%, with application of the DoD Instruction 1332.39 and Application of the Veterans Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) under spine rules applicable on or before 23 September 2002. At the MEB exam, 5 months before separation, the CI reported pain‐“pains that radiate down the leg from back pains” on the DD 2807 without elaboration in the NARSUM. Service...